<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LM3915 Based Spectrum Analyzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aonomus.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/lm3915-based-spectrum-analyzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aonomus.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/lm3915-based-spectrum-analyzer/</link>
	<description>Why talk about it now?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aonomus</title>
		<link>http://aonomus.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/lm3915-based-spectrum-analyzer/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>aonomus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aonomus.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-49</guid>
		<description>He seems to have used a bunch of comparators for his driver, summing the outputs. It might be cheaper to build it using discrete multi-comparator IC&#039;s but it seems like it would be more error prone.

I have however noticed some strange behavior with the LM3915&#039;s, my circuit&#039;s dot/bar pin would not function (I have 2 IC&#039;s, 7 on backorder), and some LED functionality was unreliable, requiring the voltage to be up to 18-20V. The datasheet explains it as oscillation occuring, however trying to get rid of it seems to be very hard (plus I can&#039;t seem to view it on my scope at all). I can&#039;t seem to duplicate the oscillation after boosting voltage from 12 to 20V and adding the &#039;recommended&#039; cap from the datasheet. I don&#039;t have any tanatlums handy (well, I have SMD salvaged ones but those aren&#039;t all too reliable/trustworthy), but the electrolytic solves some of the oscillation problems, as well as the undervolt. The oscillation/undervolt is characterized by the peak volume LED being lit the brightest with all the other lower signal LED&#039;s dimming relative to which peak LED is selected.

Its a scary coincidence that I&#039;m using the LM358 for the fliege filter, and almost the exact same cap values. I might as well use his table since those resistors seem more available. I only picked a 7 band spectrum analyzer cause its the number of LM3915&#039;s I could get under $20 CDN (pre-tax of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He seems to have used a bunch of comparators for his driver, summing the outputs. It might be cheaper to build it using discrete multi-comparator IC&#8217;s but it seems like it would be more error prone.</p>
<p>I have however noticed some strange behavior with the LM3915&#8217;s, my circuit&#8217;s dot/bar pin would not function (I have 2 IC&#8217;s, 7 on backorder), and some LED functionality was unreliable, requiring the voltage to be up to 18-20V. The datasheet explains it as oscillation occuring, however trying to get rid of it seems to be very hard (plus I can&#8217;t seem to view it on my scope at all). I can&#8217;t seem to duplicate the oscillation after boosting voltage from 12 to 20V and adding the &#8216;recommended&#8217; cap from the datasheet. I don&#8217;t have any tanatlums handy (well, I have SMD salvaged ones but those aren&#8217;t all too reliable/trustworthy), but the electrolytic solves some of the oscillation problems, as well as the undervolt. The oscillation/undervolt is characterized by the peak volume LED being lit the brightest with all the other lower signal LED&#8217;s dimming relative to which peak LED is selected.</p>
<p>Its a scary coincidence that I&#8217;m using the LM358 for the fliege filter, and almost the exact same cap values. I might as well use his table since those resistors seem more available. I only picked a 7 band spectrum analyzer cause its the number of LM3915&#8217;s I could get under $20 CDN (pre-tax of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://aonomus.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/lm3915-based-spectrum-analyzer/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aonomus.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Have you seen this project?
http://tchips.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=35&amp;Itemid=1

He too uses Fliege filters for a 7-band analyzer.  I&#039;m attempting to build this, but instead of nixie tubes I&#039;d like to use LM3915&#039;s to drive the LED&#039;s.  This is quite similar to what you are attempting.

Perhaps his schematics will help.  I have very little experience with circuit design, so I hope you carry forward with your project.  I&#039;m very much looking forward to your next post, best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen this project?<br />
<a href="http://tchips.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=35&amp;Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://tchips.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=35&amp;Itemid=1</a></p>
<p>He too uses Fliege filters for a 7-band analyzer.  I&#8217;m attempting to build this, but instead of nixie tubes I&#8217;d like to use LM3915&#8217;s to drive the LED&#8217;s.  This is quite similar to what you are attempting.</p>
<p>Perhaps his schematics will help.  I have very little experience with circuit design, so I hope you carry forward with your project.  I&#8217;m very much looking forward to your next post, best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
